🔗 Share this article

Jilly Cooper, who died suddenly at the age of 88, racked up sales of 11m books of her assorted grand books over her 50-year literary career. Cherished by every sensible person over a certain age (45), she was presented to a new generation last year with the Disney+ adaptation of Rivals.

The Rutshire Chronicles

Devoted fans would have preferred to see the Rutshire chronicles in chronological order: beginning with Riders, initially released in 1985, in which the infamous Rupert Campbell-Black, rogue, philanderer, rider, is debuts. But that’s a minor point – what was notable about watching Rivals as a box set was how effectively Cooper’s universe had stood the test of time. The chronicles distilled the eighties: the power dressing and voluminous skirts; the preoccupation with social class; the upper class looking down on the ostentatious newly wealthy, both ignoring everyone else while they complained about how lukewarm their champagne was; the intimate power struggles, with harassment and abuse so everyday they were virtually personas in their own right, a duo you could rely on to drive the narrative forward.

While Cooper might have lived in this period totally, she was never the proverbial fish not noticing the ocean because it’s ubiquitous. She had a compassion and an perceptive wisdom that you could easily miss from her public persona. All her creations, from the pet to the pony to her mother and father to her international student's relative, was always “completely delightful” – unless, that is, they were “completely exquisite”. People got harassed and worse in Cooper’s work, but that was never condoned – it’s astonishing how tolerated it is in many supposedly sophisticated books of the period.

Social Strata and Personality

She was upper-middle-class, which for real-world terms meant that her parent had to hold down a job, but she’d have defined the strata more by their mores. The bourgeoisie anxiously contemplated about all things, all the time – what others might think, mainly – and the aristocracy didn’t bother with “nonsense”. She was raunchy, at times incredibly so, but her prose was always refined.

She’d recount her upbringing in idyllic language: “Daddy went to battle and Mother was deeply concerned”. They were both absolutely stunning, engaged in a enduring romance, and this Cooper emulated in her own marriage, to a publisher of war books, Leo Cooper. She was in her mid-twenties, he was 27, the union wasn’t smooth sailing (he was a bit of a shagger), but she was always at ease giving people the recipe for a blissful partnership, which is squeaky bed but (big reveal), they’re squeaking with all the mirth. He didn't read her books – he tried Prudence once, when he had flu, and said it made him feel unwell. She wasn't bothered, and said it was mutual: she wouldn’t be spotted reading war chronicles.

Constantly keep a journal – it’s very difficult, when you’re 25, to recollect what being 24 felt like

The Romance Series

Prudence (1978) was the fifth volume in the Romance novels, which began with Emily in the mid-70s. If you came to Cooper backwards, having commenced in her later universe, the initial books, AKA “those ones named after upper-class women” – also Bella and Harriet – were near misses, every hero feeling like a prototype for Campbell-Black, every heroine a little bit drippy. Plus, page for page (I haven’t actually run the numbers), there was less sex in them. They were a bit reserved on topics of propriety, women always being anxious that men would think they’re loose, men saying batshit things about why they favored virgins (comparably, apparently, as a genuine guy always wants to be the initial to open a container of Nescafé). I don’t know if I’d advise reading these novels at a formative age. I assumed for a while that that was what affluent individuals genuinely felt.

They were, however, extremely well-crafted, high-functioning romances, which is much harder than it seems. You felt Harriet’s unplanned pregnancy, Bella’s pissy relatives, Emily’s loneliness in Scotland – Cooper could take you from an hopeless moment to a windfall of the soul, and you could never, even in the beginning, identify how she managed it. One minute you’d be smiling at her meticulously detailed accounts of the bedding, the next you’d have watery eyes and no idea how they arrived.

Authorial Advice

Asked how to be a author, Cooper frequently advised the sort of advice that Ernest Hemingway would have said, if he could have been inclined to assist a novice: use all all of your faculties, say how things smelled and appeared and audible and felt and tasted – it greatly improves the writing. But likely more helpful was: “Forever keep a diary – it’s very challenging, when you’re mid-twenties, to remember what age 24 felt like.” That’s one of the primary realizations you notice, in the more detailed, character-rich books, which have seventeen main characters rather than just one lead, all with decidedly aristocratic names, unless they’re American, in which case they’re called a common name. Even an years apart of several years, between two siblings, between a male and a lady, you can hear in the speech.

The Lost Manuscript

The origin story of Riders was so pitch-perfectly Jilly Cooper it couldn't possibly have been real, except it absolutely is factual because a major newspaper ran an appeal about it at the time: she completed the entire draft in 1970, well before the Romances, brought it into the downtown and forgot it on a public transport. Some context has been intentionally omitted of this tale – what, for case, was so significant in the city that you would abandon the only copy of your manuscript on a train, which is not that different from abandoning your infant on a transport? Surely an rendezvous, but what sort?

Cooper was wont to exaggerate her own disorder and ineptitude